AfricaTrip08.com

June 8, 2008

Obama and Kenya

Filed under: Kenya — scott @ 7:45 am

Hi all,

So we’re finally in Chad..we had an interesting time getting to both here and Ethiopia, but had a fun night in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia with our friend Anna. Colin will write more about Chad, but it’s been an interesting few hours. Needless to say, I’m glad I took high school French. But we’re safe, and glad to be here.

One thing I wanted to blog about in Kenya, but didn’t get the chance, is Obama’s historic nomination. We arrived in Kenya the day that Obama officially received the Democratic nomination, and it certainly allowed us to get an interesting perspective. Obama-mania in Kenya, and largely Africa on the whole, takes the phenomenon to an entirely different level.

The fact that Obama is half-Kenyan is not lost on anyone in the country. Whenever the papers write about him, they talk about his Kenyan father within the first two paragraphs. In fact, after Obama’s victory speech, the media reported he had dedicated the win to his Kenyan grandmother. Clearly, they were a little caught up, as he was talking about his maternal grandmother, in Hawaii.

Literally everybody we talked to knew Obama, and was incredibly excited about him. Taxi-drivers sung his praise, the school headmaster claimed that Obama’s candidacy “was not about Luo or Kikuyu, but about Africa” (Obama’s relatives are Luo, which supposedly provided tense moments during the election strife). As Colin and I got ready to leave at the airport, a guard sternly questioned us about our final destination. Then, he saw our US passports, and immediately beamed, “Obama!”, he exclaimed. The entire Kenyan population is united around their half-native son.

I think there are a number of reasons that Kenyans are so enthusiastic about Obama. First and foremost, he does have strong roots in Kenya, and in the larger African continent. People are proud that one of their own might lead the most powerful country in the world. Along those same lines, he represents a successful African story. If the son of a Kenyan goat farmer can become the Democratic presidential nominee, doesn’t that give hope to all Kenyans? And finally, many think he will demonstrate his roots by providing a pro-Africa strategy upon taking office.

In my opinion, these points show one of the most exciting prospects of an Obama candidacy; he would make Africa, and much of the world, excited about America. It’s an intangible, and one that can’t be argued to the American people, but there’s an awful lot to be said for the literal and figurative new face Obama would provide to the presidency. Literally, having a black President would not only be significant to Africa, but would show the rest of the world the progress of our country, and the great strides in equality we have taken. Additionally, his talk of change could restore our rapidly deteriorating moral credibility in the world. I’m obviously biased, but I think our experience in Kenya showed the rest of the world could get excited about Obama, and because the US is the sole remaining superpower, that is not a point that should be taken lightly.

At the same time, I do fear that Kenyans are a little blindly optimistic about what an Obama presidency would actually mean. A few local op-eds stressed this point; his policies might not be all that different than the past. I think this is relevant domestically as well; Obama’s supporters often carry unrealistically high expectations. I think he can do good, but I also don’t think that all the world’s, and Africa’s, problems will end in his first four years.

Anyways, I know this is thematically off from other posts, but Obama was a very big part of being in Kenya. It will be interesting to keep tabs on how the country follows his pursuit, and what ultimately happens if we have a President Obama. Needless to say, after all Kenya has been through this year, it was pretty exciting to see everybody, from all walks of life, get excited about a common theme.

June 6, 2008

Kibera

Filed under: Kenya — colin @ 12:12 am

Kibera is the second largest slum in Africa, located just a short drive from downtown Nairobi. Scott and I, along with another friend from Brown, visited the slum yesterday to try to get a better understanding of living conditions there, and how it fits into the larger political and economic picture.

We found somebody on the outskirts of the settlement who was willing to take us around and introduce us to a few people. He explained that he didn’t feel threatened by violent crime in Kibera, but that we ran the risk of mugging if we wandered around alone.

Conditions are somewhat similar to those that I describe in the village we visited yesterday morning. Sewage pits are uncleaned, trash literally covers the ground, and the water running through hasn’t been clean for years. People rent small plots of land and construct mud/stick/tin dwellings, and they find their food from small vendors around the slum. Water has to be purchased out of large tanks. The biggest difference between the two places we visited is that Kibera is massive. Some people estimate that as many as one million people live there. It wasn’t easy for us to know where we were at any point, so having a guide was a huge help.

Once again, we stood out in a very big way. Although I know about 3 words of Swahili, one word that I constantly picked up on was mzungu or white person, which pretty much everybody said when we walked by them. It was actually really fun to see how children reacted to us, most of them saying mzungu and then running up to touch our hands briefly. Many of them have been to grade school, and one of the few English phrases they know is “how are you?” However, they love to say it over and over again, and they tend to run the words together, so wherever we went there would be a chorus of 10 or so children yelling “HOWAHYOUUU” over and over again… it was pretty adorable.

The politics of Kibera are extremely frustrating. They’re quite well documented as it’s one of the most studied slums in the world, so I’ll just give you a few facts that we picked up from our guide. It seems that the government has the power and resources to resolve many of the problems face in the slum, but choose not to for a variety of reasons. The conditions are used as a selling point for international aid, and frequently outsiders are paraded around (I’ll admit we were guilty of this) to gain sympathy and, more importantly, money. Unfortunately, this money rarely goes towards improving conditions in the slum itself, and often lands in the hands of corrupt politicians (see Scott’s previous post). Some of the political leaders in Kenya have obscenely high salaries, and they sometimes openly divert funds from resettlement programs towards their own pockets. We even heard that some of the MPs own tracts of land in Kibera and make a healthy profit off renting it to the impoverished population.

Kibera is a clear example of how government corruption and mismanaged funds are contributing to the terrible poverty that some Kenyans face. It was surreal for us to see the thousands of make-shift dwellings in the foreground with the booming economy and development downtown in the background. Kenya needs to make improving conditions and basic resources for the lower class a priority, not building million dollar malls and feeding the already prosperous business sector.

Colin

June 5, 2008

The complexities of Kenya, and the problematic simplification by the western media

Filed under: Background Info, Kenya, Zimbabwe — scott @ 11:48 pm

So we had a pretty busy day yesterday.  I have a lot I want to talk about, but we’re at an internet cafe so I’m not sure how much time I have.  I’ll attempt to briefly contextualize the conflict in Kenya, and then talk about the deteriorating situation in Zim, just to update you.

We had the opportunity to meet with two Canadians yesterday; one representative from the International Crisis Group, and one historian PHD candidate down here from Cambridge University in England.  They both were extremely knowledgable on recent political strife in Kenya.  We had an hour and a half conversation about it, so I’m sure I won’t be able to do it justice now, especially since we didn’t take notes (which we suprisingly haven’t done in any of our meetings).

If we took one thing out of the meeting, it is that the situation in Kenya is extraordinarily complex; much more so than the simplistic samplings that came out of the international media during the conflict.  At the end of December, Kenya had an election, pitting the incumbent, Mwai Kibaki, against the opposition candidate, Raila Odinga.  While most reports had Odinga winning, Kibaki rigged the election, winning power and instantly stepping back into office.  Deep-seeded violence followed for two months, resulting in a new unity government, in which Odinga is Prime Minister to Kibaki’s government.  So all’s now peachy, huh?

The first thing to take into account is that the violence started largely because of the vote rigging.  According to the two people we met with, Kenyans hold a deep-regard for the power of “one vote.”  As soon as people realized that their one vote might not have mattered, regardless of their political affiliation, they became angered.  This distrust of democracy led to the first round of violence.

The second round, however, became much more complex.  Much of it had to do with deep-seeded differences between the Kenyan people; the fact that the Kikyuys (Kibaki’s tribe) had usurped land and power of the Luo (Odinga’s tribe), as well as a difference in opinion over the concept of federalism, or allowing Kenyan provinces to hold more power, rather than a purely nationalistic federal government, a big issue during the campaign.  This wasn’t tribalism violence in its simplistic form (as reported by the media), but a more complex disagreement over several long-standing issues.

The violence ended largely when a peace agreement forged by former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan was signed.  Many have thought this demonstrated a solution to all the problems.  However, it’s a mistake to think Kenya’s in the clear.  The agreement was a page and a half and failed to address any key issues.  The unity government is now bloated in size; the election was held to decide who was to step into power.  Instead, everybody came into power.  There are too many ministers; the government is now dedicated to paying those ministers, rather than helping the people.

Additionally, and even more problematically, violence became legitimized.  While six hundred people died in less than two months, Odinga was able to rise into power.  Simply, he would not be prime minister if violence had not occurred.  So for Kenyans, violence proved more effective than actually voting.

Thus, as they told us, the future is not as rosy as we all may think.  Kenya’s still extremely poor, and while the people at the top attempt to figure out the foray into power, most the of the people aren’t being helped.  Additionally, without the proper implementation and consolidation of democratic institutions (the same electoral commission that led to the vote rigging has not been changed at all!!!), democracy is going to have problems.  The Kenyans, despite being a peace-loving people, seemed to have lost their faith in government.

Again, as in Zimbabwe, this shows the problems that form when we simplify conflicts.  Back in January, as activists, we condemned Kenya, compared it to Rwanda (which is extremely problematic) and glorified the opposition.  Now we realize that the problems were not solely related to the election, that all the politicians are to blame (including the opposition), and Kenya, while not seeing violence right now, has a long way to go to rectify itself and return to solid footing.  It’s really sad; Kenya seemed to be the African success story; a country that had embraced democracy and was ripe to soar, both politically and economically.  Now, the future is extremely uncertain, but it’s not looking very good.

Additionally, Kenya is a country I wouldn’t necessarily rush to apply the Responsibility to Protect to, as we did in January.  This wasn’t really a case of a government failing to protect its people; it was the utter failure of democracy.  As I posted before, democracy and human rights are inextricably intertwined.  We can’t simply focus on a short-term secession of violence if we’re serious about helping Kenya; we need to focus on the difficult road of consolidating democracy, returning the value of the vote, and restoring the confidence in government to the people of Kenya.  It’s a long road, but we can’t forget about the country simply because people aren’t dying anymore.

Anyways, I hope this has been somewhat informative, and if nothing else, encourages you to learn more about the underlying issues at stake in Kenya, rather than the simplistic take offered by the media.

Also, I hope you’re still reading about Zimbabwe.  Besides their ridiculous treatment of the US/British diplomatic convoy yesterday, they suspended all humanitarian aid, responsible for giving care to approximately two million Zimbabweans who can’t afford food.  To be extremely blunt, about three weeks from the run-off, shit’s hitting the fan.  It’ll be interesting to see what happens, but for now, it’s really saddening.  The government is doing everything in their power to win an election, regardless of the effect on the general population.

First day in Kenya

Filed under: Kenya — colin @ 1:31 am

Hey All!

We left Zimbabwe yesterday afternoon after an incredibly interesting trip. We were very fortunate to have the ability to hear so many different perspectives. We’ll try to do the same in Kenya, but we probably won’t be able to have quite as many interviews. I hope that you’ll keep reading and send us any questions or anything you’re wondering while we’re here.

This morning we stopped by a grade school not far from where Scott’s old house was. Scott had briefly helped out there and we were interested in seeing how it had progressed in the last five years. The headmaster was more than happy to take us around the school, and we visited each of the classrooms.

Classrooms were divided by year and they varied greatly in the size. Some had around 30 children, while others had as many as 100. There are nowhere near enough desks for the number of students, and the headmaster cited lack of furniture as one of their biggest problems. In some of the rooms, more than half the class were sitting on mats on the floor.

Many of the teachers are volunteers from the surrounding community, but Scott and I noticed that about half of the classrooms didn’t have a teacher in it when we visited. Surprisingly (I sure as hell didn’t do this in grade school) the kids were working away at their problems without supervision. Many of the children come to school because they serve them two meals, and the headmaster told us that they may not eat at all otherwise. However, they only have the supplies to serve them the same kind of food for each meal, so nutritional value is a major concern.

Interestingly, the school is set in a community that is very wealthy. Most of the houses in the area were quite large with gates surrounding their massive yards. I think Scott will touch on this in his post, but this was a perfect snapshot at the widening gap between the upper and lower class. When Scott and I asked where most of the children came from, the headmaster was kind enough to take us 400m down the road to the very impoverished village that most of the children live in.

In some ways, the village was the “typical” poor African village that many of us read about or see on TV. Houses are made of clay, sticks and tin roofs. There are lambs and goats walking around or penned up in houses. Trash and stagnant water cover the small alleys that run in between all of the houses, and men and women were cleaning their clothes in the river at the bottom of the village. Sadly, we noticed that despite the large school down the street, many of the children were staying at home. We talked to one boy who had to stay home and look after his siblings instead of going to school because his mother could not afford to have a maid stay at the house.

Because I’ve taken a bunch of global health classes, I couldn’t help noticing how dangerous the conditions were for the community, especially the children. Standing water mixed with sewage was prevalent, and the river in which most of the clothes and dishes are washed was far from clean. There is little access to professional care for people like one man who had lost two of his fingers after an incident where he was seizing because of his untreated epilepsy. He also had an open and bleeding wound on his temple that the headmaster thought was from a fall he suffered during an episode. Another child had an open and bleeding rash on the back of their leg, which the headmaster suggested was syphilis, but was clearly undiagnosed.

I’m at an internet cafe right now, so that’s all I’ll write today. It has been especially frustrating for us to be able to walk out of a village like that, and 10 minuets later be in a wealthy market with computer and jewelry shops. The discrepancy between classes is glaring. Scott will touch more on the foundation of this problem.

Colin

A New, Globalized Home

Filed under: Background Info, Kenya — scott @ 1:29 am

Oh, to be back in Kenya.  This blog obviously isn’t about me on a personal level, but I did live here for three years, so it’s a little strange to be back.  To be incredibly trite, so much has changed, and so much is the same.  One thing I apologize for in advance; we haven’t done a comprehensive summary on the situation in Kenya.  I’ll try to do this at some point, but please read the ENOUGH Project’s recent report if you get a chance.  We’re meeting in a few hours with someone from the International Crisis Group, who will give us more information that we can give you.

We got in last night and my friend Leila picked us up at the airport.  Even the road back shows the changing climate of Kenya.  There was absolutely insane traffic; it took us an hour and a half to drive about 10 miles.  This never used to happen.  The city is absolutely booming; high risers are a frequent site, and there are literally too many cars on the street.  Even the mall we’re in now is just as nice as any American mall.

At first glance, Kenya appears to be a modernized city.  Indeed it’s GDP is growing at a rate of 5-7% a year.  The current President, Mwai Kibaki, liberalized the economy upon entering power, and it seems to be bearing fruit.

Ay, but there’s the rub.  I don’t want to give a big analysis of the very complex subject of globalization, but clearly, despite an emerging middle class, it’s not trickling down to the lower class.  As Colin posted about our day, you can see that there’s still an immense amount of poverty here.  It’s a different kind of poverty that Zimbabwe; it’s very structural in nature, rather than caused by political machinations.  The education system is faltering, the domestic industries were not adequately prepared before an entry to the global economy, and it’s hard for people to get up in the economic ladder.

As I think Colin is writing about (this is the first time we’ve blogged simultaneously), we went to visit my house, and from there, a school I taught at when I was here.  We visited a small village about a ten minute walk from my former house.  The village was incredibly poor; houses with ransacked roofs, no plumbing or electricity, and people making illicit alcohol to get buy.  The saddest part for me was that I lived in this country three years, and never knew about the village, even though it was ten minutes away from me.  That’s how this country is; I lived in an incredibly nice house, with a great mall and school, and an incredibly impoverished village, unnoticed to the common eye, was ten minutes away.  That’s irresponsible globalization (I don’t want to imply that the concept is always bad): benefiting the few, leaving the masses behind.

The other thing that definitely is not invisible is the effects of the political crisis from January and February, when a disputed election put the country in turmoil and unrest.  The headmaster at the school noted that more than fifty students had been displaced, and constantly referred to it as he gave us a tour.  So did Leila’s parents; despite a seemingly stable country now; it is still tense, and the economy has undoubtedly been negatively affected.  It’s a testament to our tendency to ignore conflict-ridden zones after the initial conflict is over.  There are no longer hundreds dying in Kenya, but the structural problems (tribalism, land inequality) are still rampant.  It’ll be interesting to see how that plays out.  I’ll blog more about the political situation later.

One other interesting aside: every paper in the country today has Obama on the cover.  I bought the Daily Nation (figure it’ll be a cool keepsake) which states, “Historic Moment, Senator with Kenyan roots clinches US Democratic ticket in White House race” with a full page image of a smiling Obama.  They also have a special 11 page pullout dedicated to his clinching the nomination.  His impact is widely felt here; I’ll dedicate an entry to that as well; after we talk to more Kenyans about their assessment of him.

So, it’s good to be home.  And with skyscrapers, big houses, extravagant malls, and Barack Obama on the front page of every newspaper, one could mistake Kenya for the Western world.  But a deeper investigation demonstrates the great challenges this country faces as it seeks to harness the potential of globalization, and move past the effects of a devastating political crisis.

June 3, 2008

Zimbabwe and Kenya

Filed under: Kenya, Zimbabwe — scott @ 2:33 pm

So, we’re almost done in Zimbabwe. We had an interesting day today… My mother works at the self-help coordinator at the US Embassy, which basically means she works with communities to design projects that they can use to help themselves (for example, income generating projects for women). We went out to a care center to talk to women about a potential project. We met with about twenty women, all who were HIV positive. They also all had mentally disabled children, many of who were at the site.

It was pretty sad; most of the women said they were having troube getting antiviral medication. One woman said she had to choose between food and the medication, and it was too much to go hungry. Yet, they were resolved to apply for funding, possibly starting a project to sew fabrics which they could then sell in town, and then use the money to buy medication. These women all want to live just so they can take care of their children; because if they pass away, no one will be there for them. At the end of the meeting though, they joyously sang and dance for us. Again, despite adversity, they showed resiliency.

Tomorrow we’ll head off for Kenya; it will be less of an intense trip. I lived there for three years and we’re staying with one of my best friends. While we will do some traveling and see some slums, I also hope to have a little fun and relax a bit before we head to Chad. I love the country, and it will be nice to get back. On another note, I’m looking forward to talking to people about their impressions of Obama, as he’s poised to gather the Democratic nomination. I’ve heard most of the country is absolutely thrilled, although Obama does come from the Luo tribe, part of the tribal conflicts sustained earlier this year. On a personal note, I do think it’s pretty amazing that the US is poised to have a half African as a major presidential candidate. Regardless of your political beliefs, I think it is something to reflect upon, and something I’ll write more on later.

Many people we’ve talked to have compared the situation in Zimbabwe to the situation in Kenya earlier this year. We’ll go over it more in depth in the next day or two, but Raila Odinga (a Luo), the opposition candidate, seemed to have won the election over Mwai Kibaki (a Kikuyu), the incumbent. Kibaki clearly rigged the elections and claimed victory, playing the part of Mugabe. Odinga, however, failed to concede, using all available means to ensure a path to power, including protests and mass uprisings. In the end, he received the post of prime minister in a unity government, second to Kibaki’s command. Many Zimbabweans cite this example as one they should follow. However, it should be noted that more than 600 Kenyans lost their lives during the struggle. It’s not an ideal situation.

As we leave Zimbabwe, we’ve had a very rewarding, enriching, and informative experience. I’ll do closing blogs on each country at the end of the trip, so I won’t say much now. I do want to share two articles that demonstrate the problems with the Responsibility to Protect, problems I’ve been citing throughout our trip. An article in the New York Times notes the difference between advocating for intervention, and accepting the potential unintended consequences of such an intervention. An opinion article today in the Washington Post notes the institutional failures of the UN to effectively stop political crises, pointing to President Mugabe’s current trip to Italy, and their failure to do anything about it.

We’ve come along way in beginning to change norms and advocate for humanitarian interventions. ZImbabwe shows, however, how far we have to go. As a political crisis persists, as people starve and die daily, the world stands to the side, paralyzed.

Powered by WordPress